|
|
Full length items that typically deal with career issues, product reviews
or test drives of the latest Web 2.0 services.
|
|
|
|
|
Career
|
|
Written by Brian Austin
|
|
Friday, 05 August 2005 |
|
Seems like everyone is working hard these days. Over the past few years the squeeze has really been put on employees as co-workers have either left their job, or transitioned to a new one. Those left behind often inherit the departed person's workload, and even if a replacement is hired they may have different work responsibilities. This lack of hiring has caused many to feel overworked, underappreciated and generally contributes to low worker moral.
But are things really that bad? Sometime last year I read a story about programmers working at Activision. The story was horrible, with mandatory overtime starting nearly at the same time as the project. This kind of environment is never sustainable in the long run and often leads to mistakes. What I find interesting is that this practice is nothing new. A month or so ago I stumbled upon Jamie Zawinski's web site where he recalls working on the Netscape project back in the mid nineties.
Surprisingly, during this time of a "dot-com bubble", when hiring was rampant, the developers of the Netscape browser found themselves overworked and underappreciated. Worst of all their browser would eventually fall to the mighty goliath called Internet Explorer. But for a time, Zawinksi and his co-workers thought they were changing the world.. or the World Wide Web at least.
So give his site a look if you're interested. It's not well organized and the narratives can be a bit long, but it's worth the read if your interested in the so-called "dream workplace" of information technology.
the netscape dorm |
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 15 June 2007 )
|
|
|
General
|
|
Written by Brian Austin
|
|
Tuesday, 05 July 2005 |
Of the numerous "new media" promises made during the dot-com era, few
ever delivered what had been promised. Still there were a few
that did make good on the promise of "this time it's different".
One in particular is the success of relative latecomer online
dating. Early on, detractors were quick to call it out as simply
an online meat market, or at best a meet-and-greet hookup
service. And while some have specialized in that, others have
managed to not only help people meet each other, but to start lasting
relationships.
While the world cyber dating has brought matchmaking into the 21st
century, human behavior still remains set in the ways of the
past. A recent article by the NY Times points out that Thin
and Rich Works Here when it comes to online dating.
But the author is quick to point out that just because your not a
perfect 10 doesn't mean you won't receive any responses. One key
they cite is actually having a picture. I guess first impressions
do count for something, and research has concluded that both men and
women receive more responses. |
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 15 June 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Career
|
|
Written by Brian Austin
|
|
Tuesday, 01 February 2005 |
|
Few will disagree with the notion that the United States is now firmly entrenched in recovering from the millenniums first great downturn. However, many disagree about what exactly is pulling us away from deflation, mass unemployment and stagnation. While I'm no economist, I do believe that I can have an insight into what I believe has helped the US and other parts of the world avoid catastrophe.
Simply put, we as workers are producing more goods and services per person than four years ago. Whether or not you agree with off shoring, you must admit that increased productivity is our only defense against a low paid work force in another country. Americans are taking this to heart, and working harder than ever. However, it's easy to overlook the daily challenges still faced by the average employee. It's also easy to overlook how technology is making that job easier, and as a result making employees more productive.
For example, before the printing press, books were hand copied. After the invention of the printing press this all changed. But the advent of this new technology didn't just make one person more productive; it also created a number of jobs in the process. Now instead of requiring one person to copy book after book, a support staff of technicians, sales reps, and engineers were all required.
Skip ahead a bit to the advent of the photo-copier which greatly reduced the overhead of producing copies. Sure, it wasn't book quality, but for mass mailings, inter-office memos and duplication of paperwork it was a godsend. But just as this new technology may have reduced the number of workers required to operate and maintain the machinery, it also opened up and entire industry for the sale and support the new product.
The net effect of this technological change was jobs, and lots of them. Where as a few were tasked with copying all the books by hand hundreds of years ago, now the document imaging / copying industry not only employees many, but has spawned a number of privately owned copy shops. All told, the progress of technology tends to create more jobs than it eliminates. Granted the jobs require more skill and education, but they also tend to pay employees more.
Now you may be asking what does this have to do with productivity. The advent of the copier made making copies a much less labor intensive process. Fewer workers could produce more copies as a whole than an army of workers could by hand. Today hand copying of books is unheard of. Were jobs lost because of productivity gains? Possibly, but the vast majority were never created. The companion of productivity gains is increase in demand. As long as demand for a product continues to grow, workers can keep their job and simply produce more. Producers will simply put off hiring extra workers until they become necessary. |
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 15 June 2007 )
|
|
|
The Bleeding Edge
|
|
Written by Brian Austin
|
|
Tuesday, 02 March 2004 |
"Super Size It" has become a common phrase in American pop culture, and now it's now becoming a marketing strategy. For years the health and weight loss industry has catered to American's who want to lose a few pounds, but as some have begun to embrace their expanding girth, garment manufacturers are now looking at these plus sized consumers as potential customers.
A project called SizeUSA has conducted a survey of average men and women and determined that the age old garment measurements (determined in the 1940s) no longer hold true today. By their determination, the average women's clothing would be two sizes larger than historically thought. Under the traditional measurments, some of todays cloths labeled as size 8 would actually be labeled as size 10. But that hasn't stopped some garment manufacturers from mislabling sizes to cater to customer's vanity.
The problem is that data collected by companies only reflects what does or doesn't sell in the store. Manufacturers have no way of knowing how or why they've lost potential sales. The current "size" measurement doesn't accurately portray customers, and doesn't generate the needed feedback for garment makers.
At first glance, this would appear to be a PR stunt to sell consulting services to the garment industry. The company that conducted the study, Cary, NC based [TC]?, offers consulting and training services to garment manufactures. However, if you look closely at the services they offer you will notice that data collected is grouped in a way that will help manufacturers better tailor their garments to meet a specific set of customers.
In the past manufactures relied on a set of general measurements based upon data collected in the 40s with measuring tape. The data collected for SizeUSA attempts to refine those general measurements by using four strategically placed cameras to take around 200 measurements of a person's body. This sampling is achieved in less than a minute, which allowed the company to sample a large number of people.
While the new data represents a sizable improvement for the way garments are designed and manufactured, the underlying conclusion of this study is that American's are getting taller and heavier. Jim Lovejoy, director of the project, stresses that while this is the case, American's are clearly becoming heavier faster than they are growing taller. This seems to support the opinion health professionals that American's are increasing becoming obese.
Article:...
|
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 15 June 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
| << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
| | Results 21 - 24 of 24 |
|
|
|
|
|